cardiology · Other

Discontinuation of β-blockers in stable patients with previous myocardial infarction, preserved left ventricular ejection fraction, and no heart failure: a pooled analysis of individual patient data.

Silvain Johanne J, Choi Ki Hong KH, Monguillon Victorien V, Kang Danbee D, Cayla Guillaume G, Kim Weon W et al.
Lancet (London, England) · Sep 19, 2026 · PMID 42669300 · DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(26)01426-1

Abstract (English)

BACKGROUND: Many stable patients with chronic coronary syndrome continue &#x3b2;-blocker therapy for years after a myocardial infarction, despite having no clear ongoing indication. Whether &#x3b2;-blockers can be safely discontinued in such patients remains uncertain. The objective of this analysis was to assess the non-inferiority of &#x3b2;-blocker discontinuation versus continuation in patients with previous myocardial infarction and no remaining indication. METHODS: We performed a pooled analysis of individual patient data from the ABYSS and SMART-DECISION randomised trials in stable patients over 6 months after a myocardial infarction with a left ventricular ejection fraction of ≥40% and no heart failure. Non-inferiority was assessed for the composite primary endpoint of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or hospitalisation for cardiovascular reasons, and for the key secondary endpoint of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, or hospitalisation for heart failure. Analyses used a one-stage mixed-effects Cox proportional hazards model including trial as a random effect with margins of 1&#xb7;25 for the primary endpoint and 1&#xb7;40 for the key secondary endpoint. The review protocol was registered with PROSPERO, number CRD420261299839. FINDINGS: Among 6238 patients (3698 from ABYSS and 2540 from SMART-DECISION), 3092 were assigned to &#x3b2;-blocker discontinuation and 3146 to continuation. Median time from index myocardial infarction to randomisation was 3&#xb7;6 years (IQR 1&#xb7;6-7&#xb7;5) and median follow-up was 3&#xb7;0 years (2&#xb7;3-3&#xb7;8). The primary endpoint occurred in 532 (17&#xb7;2%) of 3092 patients in the &#x3b2;-blocker discontinuation group and 500 (15&#xb7;9%) of 3146 in the continuation group (hazard ratio 1&#xb7;09 [95% CI 0&#xb7;97-1&#xb7;24]; p<sub>non-inferiority</sub>=0&#xb7;016). The key secondary endpoint occurred in 201 (6&#xb7;5%) of 3092 patients in the discontinuation group and 201 (6&#xb7;4%) of 3146 patients in the continuation group (1&#xb7;01 [0&#xb7;83-1&#xb7;23]; p<sub>non-inferiority</sub>=0&#xb7;0006). Findings were consistent irrespective of background left ventricular ejection fraction. INTERPRETATION: In stable patients with previous myocardial infarction, left ventricular ejection fraction ≥40%, no heart failure, and no other indication for &#x3b2;-blocker therapy, discontinuation met the non-inferiority criteria for the primary and key secondary endpoints. Interpretation of the primary endpoint is limited by its hospitalisation-heavy and trial-dependent composition. FUNDING: None.

Read on PubMed

สรุปภาษาไทย · Thai PICO Summary

Population (ตัวอย่าง)

ผู้ป่วยผู้ใหญ่ที่ได้รับการวินิจฉัยตามเกณฑ์มาตรฐาน …

สรุปภาษาไทย PICO ฉบับเต็ม สำหรับแพทย์ที่ยืนยันตัวตน — Sign up free
Sign up free